<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AKQJ10&#039;s Poker Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://akqj10blog.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://akqj10blog.com</link>
	<description>PLO8, NLO8, Tunica small-stakes, and plenty more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid bad-beat story by AKQJ10&#8217;s daily twaddle: 2010-07-29 :: AKQJ10&#39;s Poker Blog</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=263&#038;cpage=1#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>AKQJ10&#8217;s daily twaddle: 2010-07-29 :: AKQJ10&#39;s Poker Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=263#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>[...] is how I ran yesterday. http://akqj10blog.com/?p=263 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is how I ran yesterday. <a href="http://akqj10blog.com/?p=263" rel="nofollow">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=263</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stats tracker by May 2010 update on several fronts :: AKQJ10&#39;s Poker Blog</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?page_id=222&#038;cpage=1#comment-4717</link>
		<dc:creator>May 2010 update on several fronts :: AKQJ10&#39;s Poker Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?page_id=222#comment-4717</guid>
		<description>[...] Stats tracker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stats tracker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AKQJ10&#8217;s daily twaddle: 2010-05-13 by thebamaman</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=217&#038;cpage=1#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>thebamaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=217#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>Glad to see some more updates from you.  Good luck on the goals, and feel free to share some wisdom from your coach with me when you decide to show up to the Tuesday game again.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see some more updates from you.  Good luck on the goals, and feel free to share some wisdom from your coach with me when you decide to show up to the Tuesday game again.  <img src='http://akqj10blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NLO8-25: A three-barrel bvb bluff? by HasseY</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=200&#038;cpage=1#comment-4701</link>
		<dc:creator>HasseY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=200#comment-4701</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there is a bet here, just because it is O8 and it is very possible that he had a 3. The only chance I think, was to check-raise all-in to represent a nut-house. 
But I suck on NLO8, so ... (PLO8/FLO8 are my main games)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is a bet here, just because it is O8 and it is very possible that he had a 3. The only chance I think, was to check-raise all-in to represent a nut-house.<br />
But I suck on NLO8, so &#8230; (PLO8/FLO8 are my main games)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which online games are most profitable? by akqj10</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=208&#038;cpage=1#comment-4651</link>
		<dc:creator>akqj10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=208#comment-4651</guid>
		<description>Hey, man, always good to pick your brain.   I think your suggestion of HU SNGs back when I was playing 9-man ones was probably part of the reason it &quot;clicked&quot; when I saw the new DC series.   And as you say, learning to play well heads-up has spillover benefits to other forms, as long as I don&#039;t forget to adjust back from playing 50/40.
---

BTW, speaking of when I was trying to get serious about SNGs, I&#039;ve realized that my problem there was that I Peter Principled myself between the $10 and $20 level.   The lesson to learn from your example wasn&#039;t so much to concentrate on NL cash games, but to value coaching appropriately and turn to wiser people before giving up on my ability to beat the games.   Ah well, I got out with most of my roll intact which is better than a lot of people.
---

Interesting point about forums.  I guess you get what you pay for. :)   Which forums have you seen that have a tendency toward groupthink or toward privileging the opinions of the wrong people?
---

And should I use the address you left here instead of the one I&#039;ve been using for you?   You seem to get both.   I should be on Skype more these days since it&#039;s def. the IM of choice for the poker crowd.
---
[And I like this new template, except for the lack of paragraph breaks -- not sure what&#039;s going on with that.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, man, always good to pick your brain.   I think your suggestion of HU SNGs back when I was playing 9-man ones was probably part of the reason it &#8220;clicked&#8221; when I saw the new DC series.   And as you say, learning to play well heads-up has spillover benefits to other forms, as long as I don&#8217;t forget to adjust back from playing 50/40.<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>BTW, speaking of when I was trying to get serious about SNGs, I&#8217;ve realized that my problem there was that I Peter Principled myself between the $10 and $20 level.   The lesson to learn from your example wasn&#8217;t so much to concentrate on NL cash games, but to value coaching appropriately and turn to wiser people before giving up on my ability to beat the games.   Ah well, I got out with most of my roll intact which is better than a lot of people.<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>Interesting point about forums.  I guess you get what you pay for. <img src='http://akqj10blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />    Which forums have you seen that have a tendency toward groupthink or toward privileging the opinions of the wrong people?<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>And should I use the address you left here instead of the one I&#8217;ve been using for you?   You seem to get both.   I should be on Skype more these days since it&#8217;s def. the IM of choice for the poker crowd.<br />
&#8212;<br />
[And I like this new template, except for the lack of paragraph breaks -- not sure what's going on with that.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which online games are most profitable? by grindtofreedom</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=208&#038;cpage=1#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>grindtofreedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=208#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>i think the HUNL SNGs are a really good idea. besides being profitable in themselves (amazing game selection etc), the skills just translate so well to all NL games. while there is tons and tons of info out there on NL, i still dont think most people play well out of position. people are getting much more comfortable c-betting, 3-betting preflop IP, floating, etc., but im always surprised how little relative info/stress is on playing OOP or when things dont go according to plan. plus playing HU should give you a huge edge in hand reading. i read &quot;the talent code&quot; by daniel coyle, and when i tried to apply it to poker all i could think of was play more HU.

other than that, i think that omaha hi/lo cash is probably pretty profitable with relatively few &quot;sharks&quot; at the lower limits. it seems like its a game not many people play well and if youre patient with your starting hands can have a big edge. plus it seems like in the less popular games, good players are going to play higher faster, whereas in NL there are good players sometimes even at 25 or 50NL.

ive been having fun playing NL FR rush poker too. there seem to be a lot of aggro donkeys trying to bully everyone around and its easier to get paid off when they dont realize youre not monkeying around too (since they havent been at your table and dont have your stats).

just some thoughts. i obviously havent solved the online poker puzzle myself. i would also say to be extra careful of the stuff you read on forums. after spending way too much time on them last year, i realize more and more how many of the people (even the ones everyone respects and listens to) have no idea what theyre talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the HUNL SNGs are a really good idea. besides being profitable in themselves (amazing game selection etc), the skills just translate so well to all NL games. while there is tons and tons of info out there on NL, i still dont think most people play well out of position. people are getting much more comfortable c-betting, 3-betting preflop IP, floating, etc., but im always surprised how little relative info/stress is on playing OOP or when things dont go according to plan. plus playing HU should give you a huge edge in hand reading. i read &#8220;the talent code&#8221; by daniel coyle, and when i tried to apply it to poker all i could think of was play more HU.</p>
<p>other than that, i think that omaha hi/lo cash is probably pretty profitable with relatively few &#8220;sharks&#8221; at the lower limits. it seems like its a game not many people play well and if youre patient with your starting hands can have a big edge. plus it seems like in the less popular games, good players are going to play higher faster, whereas in NL there are good players sometimes even at 25 or 50NL.</p>
<p>ive been having fun playing NL FR rush poker too. there seem to be a lot of aggro donkeys trying to bully everyone around and its easier to get paid off when they dont realize youre not monkeying around too (since they havent been at your table and dont have your stats).</p>
<p>just some thoughts. i obviously havent solved the online poker puzzle myself. i would also say to be extra careful of the stuff you read on forums. after spending way too much time on them last year, i realize more and more how many of the people (even the ones everyone respects and listens to) have no idea what theyre talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NLO8-25: A three-barrel bvb bluff? by akqj10</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=200&#038;cpage=1#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>akqj10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=200#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I really appreciate the comments.

I&#039;m generally varying my bet sizing between 2/3 and full pot.  On the turn I&#039;m more likely to pot for value, but I also bet 2/3 enough that I don&#039;t think it should appear out of line with anything else I&#039;m doing.

Regarding the river -- OK, just sanity-checking that my reasoning for bluffing wasn&#039;t spewy.  As you may have seen if you clicked through, I ended up bluffing $2.50 into $3.60.   I don&#039;t see any reason to bet bigger than that; I can&#039;t imagine busted draws and a pair below tens wanting to call that bet.   But I&#039;m not good at bet sizing, so I&#039;m open to reconsidering.

Anyway, he looked me up with AAQ3 with diamonds, which is fine -- trips was certainly a small part of his range, especially given that it came in through the back door.   Just unlucky that he was so high up in his range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I really appreciate the comments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m generally varying my bet sizing between 2/3 and full pot.  On the turn I&#8217;m more likely to pot for value, but I also bet 2/3 enough that I don&#8217;t think it should appear out of line with anything else I&#8217;m doing.</p>
<p>Regarding the river &#8212; OK, just sanity-checking that my reasoning for bluffing wasn&#8217;t spewy.  As you may have seen if you clicked through, I ended up bluffing $2.50 into $3.60.   I don&#8217;t see any reason to bet bigger than that; I can&#8217;t imagine busted draws and a pair below tens wanting to call that bet.   But I&#8217;m not good at bet sizing, so I&#8217;m open to reconsidering.</p>
<p>Anyway, he looked me up with AAQ3 with diamonds, which is fine &#8212; trips was certainly a small part of his range, especially given that it came in through the back door.   Just unlucky that he was so high up in his range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NLO8-25: A three-barrel bvb bluff? by deadbeat</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?p=200&#038;cpage=1#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator>deadbeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?p=200#comment-4499</guid>
		<description>Your turn bet size might look suspicious to him. Still need to bet something to fold out his un-overpair/3 part of his range I think.
disclaimer: o8 is not my main game, but considering a switch and thus reading stuff :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your turn bet size might look suspicious to him. Still need to bet something to fold out his un-overpair/3 part of his range I think.<br />
disclaimer: o8 is not my main game, but considering a switch and thus reading stuff <img src='http://akqj10blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cross-post: My position on learning big bet poker with short stacks, succintly stated by NLO8-25: A three-barrel bvb bluff? :: AKQJ10&#39;s Poker Blog</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?page_id=178&#038;cpage=1#comment-4449</link>
		<dc:creator>NLO8-25: A three-barrel bvb bluff? :: AKQJ10&#39;s Poker Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?page_id=178#comment-4449</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-post: My position on learning big bet poker with short stacks, succintly stated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-post: My position on learning big bet poker with short stacks, succintly stated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cross-post: My position on learning big bet poker with short stacks, succintly stated by PLO8/NLO8 content&#8230; no, really &#171; AKQJ10&#8217;s Poker Blog</title>
		<link>http://akqj10blog.com/?page_id=178&#038;cpage=1#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>PLO8/NLO8 content&#8230; no, really &#171; AKQJ10&#8217;s Poker Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akqj10blog.com/?page_id=178#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>[...] the moment, I&#8217;m playing mostly PLO25, NLO25, and PLO10 on PokerStars.   I have some rather controversial views on short-stacking to learn a big-bet game. I totally get the reasoning behind the advice that you should always buy in full because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the moment, I&#8217;m playing mostly PLO25, NLO25, and PLO10 on PokerStars.   I have some rather controversial views on short-stacking to learn a big-bet game. I totally get the reasoning behind the advice that you should always buy in full because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
